Quitting smoking prior to a lung cancer diagnosis is associated with a survival benefit, even among patients who recently stopped smoking, according to results of a pooled analysis.
The overall survival advantage was significant regardless of how long ago patients had last smoked, including among those who quit within 2 years prior to their diagnosis.
These findings create a “teachable moment” for health care providers in scenarios when patients might be more receptive to a stop-smoking message, according to investigator Aline F. Fares, MD, a clinical research fellow at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto.
“Our study can be summarized to patients as, ‘it’s never too late to quit,’ ” Dr. Fares said.
She presented results from
Dr. Fares presented data on 35,481 patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer who had been enrolled in 17 studies conducted by the International Lung Cancer Consortium. (Data in the presentation were updated from the abstract.)
At diagnosis, 47.5% of the patients were current smokers, 30% were former smokers, and 22.5% were never smokers.
The risk of death from any cause was cut by 20% among former smokers who quit more than 5 years before their lung cancer diagnosis (P < .001). Patients who quit smoking 2-5 years before diagnosis had a 16% reduction in the risk of death, while those who quit within 2 years of diagnosis had a 12% reduced risk (P < .001 for both comparisons).
The overall survival advantage was evident in this pooled analysis regardless of patient sex, disease stage, histology, or amount of smoking as measured in pack-years, according to Dr. Fares. That said, the overall survival advantage appeared to be even greater among heavier smokers (i.e., greater than 30 pack-years) as compared with lighter smokers.
Lung cancer–specific survival was improved by 15% for patients who quit smoking more than 5 years prior to their diagnosis. For those who had quit more recently, there was a nonsignificant trend toward improvement in this outcome.
Overall survival was higher in never smokers in comparison with current smokers, a finding that was expected based on previous studies, according to Dr. Fares.
These findings could be important to share with individuals who are current smokers at the time of lung cancer screening, according to, medical director of the tobacco treatment program at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
“The power of this data is that it shows quitting makes a difference, and that it can be more impactful the longer you quit before you get diagnosed,” Dr. Karam-Hage said in an interview.
Negative lung cancer screening results sometimes give individuals the false impression that they are “one of the lucky ones” who won’t get lung cancer and don’t have to quit smoking, according to Dr. Karam-Hage, who isthe comparative effectiveness of different smoking cessation strategies.
“Now, as part of shared decision making, we can provide people with specific numbers before the scan that [suggest] no matter what the scan comes out with, the earlier they quit, the better off they will be,” he said.
In her presentation, Dr. Fares said that lung cancer screening may be an “interesting time” to address smoking cessation, particularly among patients with a heavier smoking history.
“After a lifetime of smoking, patients often feel it’s too late to quit smoking and that the damage has already been done,” she added.
The International Lung Cancer Consortium studies had multiple supporters. Dr. Fares reported having no disclosures related to the research. One researcher reported relationships with AbbVie, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Canada, and Takeda. Dr. Karam-Hage reported having no relevant disclosures.
SOURCE: Fares AF et al. ASCO 2020, .
This article was updated 5/15/20.