A new meta-analysis has largely confirmed what is already known about the lifestyle factors that increase and those that decrease the risk of developing.
The use ofand nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with a decreased risk for colorectal cancer, the new article concludes. But it also adds a number of other factors that are associated with a decreased risk for the disease, including taking magnesium and folate supplements and eating dairy products, fiber, soy, and fruits and vegetables.
On the other hand, consumption of meat and alcohol was associated with an increased risk for colorectal cancer in almost all of the analyses included in this article.
The study wasSeptember 28 in Gut.
However, the authors pointed out that it is important to keep in mind that in most cases, the level of evidence is low or very low, primarily because of the heterogeneity of the various published studies, as well as the type of study.
“Furthermore, in most cases, we were unable to identify an optimal dose and duration of exposure/intake for any of the products, even in the case of low-dose aspirin and other compounds that have been extensively assessed,” they wrote.
The findings of this new meta-analysis echo previous findings on this issue.
A number of studies, for example, have found varying associations between the consumption of red meat and cancer. The American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund have published several reports during the past 10 years on the effect of diet, nutrition, and/or physical activity on risk for several cancer types. Their, published in 2017, concluded that eating red meat and processed meat may increase the risk for colorectal cancer, as may drinking two or more alcoholic beverages per day.
In the latest article in Gut, researchers led by Marc Bardou, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon (France), conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions that assessed chemopreventive products for colorectal cancer in an average-risk population.
A total of 80 meta-analyses of interventional and observational studies were included. The studies investigated a wide range of chemopreventive agents in an average-risk population and the risk for colorectal cancer. Agents included medications (aspirin, NSAIDs, statins), vitamins or supplements (magnesium; calcium;; , B, C, E, and D; beta-carotene; and selenium), and dietary items (coffee, tea, fish, dairy products, fiber, fruits, vegetables, meat, and alcohol).
The studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Most of the meta-analyses found a protective effect for aspirin, which lowered the risk by between 14% and 29% even at doses as low as 75 mg/day, with a dose-response effect of up to 325 mg/day. The certainty of evidence was moderate.
NSAID use was also associated with a protective effect, with a significant 26%-43% decrease in the incidence in colorectal cancer. The optimal duration for the observed protective effect remains unclear. Two meta-analyses suggested that NSAIDs may need to be taken for at least 5 years, although one article suggested a protective effect after the first year. The certainty of evidence was low.
Use of magnesium was found to be protective, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.78-0.87. High intake ofwas associated with a significant decrease in risk (RR, 0.85-0.88). The certainty of evidence was low and very low, respectively.
Consumption of dairy products was associated with 13%-19% lower risk for the disease. However, the authors note that, because of the small number of available meta-analyses, the multiplicity of outcomes, and the variety of dairy products, it was not possible to reach any firm conclusions about the amount needed or the duration necessary for a protective effect.
Another dietary item, fiber, was associated with a 22%-43% lower risk. Consumption of fruits and vegetables was associated with up to a 52% lower risk, with an added benefit for every additional 100 g/day increase in intake. Soy intake was also associated with a small but significant decrease in risk (8%-15%).
For many of the other items reviewed, evidence was either weak or no beneficial effect was seen.