Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) readings are more accurate than office BP readings in routine clinical practice for identifying patients with possible hypertension, a new study found. The systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between AOBP and office BP readings measured in routine clinical practice and in research studies, and ambulatory BP recorded during awake hours. Among the findings:
- Data were compiled from 31 articles and 9,279 participants (4,736 men and 4,543 women).
- In samples with systolic AOBP of ≥130 mm Hg, routine office and research systolic BP readings were substantially higher than AOPB readings.
- Systolic awake ambulatory BP and AOBP readings were similar.
- Mean AOBP did not exhibit any white coat effect.
Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [Published online ahead of print February 4, 2019]. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6551.
This Week's Must Reads
Must Reads in Cardiology
Consumption of SSBs & Risk of Mortality, Circulation; ePub 2019 Mar 18; Malik, et al
Dietary Cholesterol or Egg Consumption & CVD, JAMA; 2019 Mar 19; Zhong, Van Horn, et al
Physical Activity & Incidence of CHD & CVD in Women, JAMA Netw Open; ePub 2019 Mar 15; LaCroix, et al
Intensive BP Control in Adults with Hypertension Who Smoke, JAMA Netw Open; ePub 2019 Mar 8; Scarpa, et al
Leisure-Time Physical Activity Across Adulthood, JAMA Netw Open; ePub 2019 Mar 8; Saint-Maurice, et al