Article

Azathioprine vs cyclosporine in recipients of HLA-identical renal allografts

Author and Disclosure Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Siblings with identical human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are preferred transplant donors.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes in azathioprine-treated and cyclosporine-treated recipients of renal transplants from HLA-identical siblings.

METHODS

Retrospective review.

RESULTS

From August 1980 to June 1989, 53 consecutive patients received renal transplants from HLA-identical donors. These patients received prednisone and either azathioprine (n = 26) or cyclosporine (n = 27). A mean of 8.4 years elapsed since transplantation in the azathioprine-treated patients and 4.7 years elapsed in the cyclosporine-treated patients. The 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 92%, respectively, for azathioprine-treated patients and 96% and 83%, respectively, for cyclosporine-treated patients (P = .379 for comparison of graft survival). There was no difference between the two groups in the number of rejections or the time to the first rejection episode. At 5 years after transplantation, cyclosporine-treated patients had a significantly higher median serum creatinine concentration (1.7 mg/dL) than did azathioprine-treated patients (1.3 mg/dL, P = .018). Maintenance steroid therapy was successfully withdrawn in six azathioprine-treated patients and seven cyclosporine-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine and cyclosporine produce equally satisfactory outcomes in this immunologically favored group. The need for continued steroid therapy in these patients requires further study.


 

Next Article: