PURLs

Does azithromycin have a role in cesarean sections?

Author and Disclosure Information

Yes, adding azithromycin to the usual antibiotic protocol in nonelective c-sections reduces infections. But not everyone can take advantage of it.

PRACTICE CHANGER

Prescribe a one-time dose of azithromycin 500 mg intravenously, along with standard antibiotic prophylaxis, at the time of cesarean delivery to prevent postoperative infections.1

STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION

B: Based on a single good-quality, randomized controlled trial.

Tita AT, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, et al. Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1231-1241.


 

References

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 26-year-old G1P0 at 40w1d presents in spontaneous labor and is dilated to 4 cm. The patient reached complete cervical dilation after artificial rupture of membranes and oxytocin augmentation. After 4 hours of pushing, there has been minimal descent of the fetal vertex beyond +1 station with significant caput succedaneum. Her physician decides to proceed with cesarean delivery.2,3 What antibiotics should be administered prior to incision to reduce postoperative infection?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that nearly 1.3 million cesarean deliveries were performed in the United States in 2015, which represents about a third of all births.4 C-section is the most common major surgical procedure performed in this country and is associated with an infection rate 5 to 10 times that of vaginal delivery.5,6 Pregnancy-associated infection, particularly during delivery, is a significant risk and the fourth most common cause of maternal death in the United States.5

The current standard of care in cesarean delivery is antibiotic prophylaxis (often a first-generation cephalosporin) prior to skin incision.7 The majority of c-sections performed are nonelective, and of these, postoperative infections occur in 12% of women who receive standard prophylaxis.8,9 A small, single-center design trial suggested azithromycin adjunctive therapy expands antibiotic coverage to Ureaplasma species, resulting in a lower risk of postoperative infection.10

This study evaluated the use of azithromycin adjunctive therapy, in addition to standard antibiotic prophylaxis, to reduce the risk of postoperative infections in women receiving nonelective c-sections.

STUDY SUMMARY

Azithromycin reduced maternal infections up to 6 weeks post–c-section

A multicenter, randomized double-blind trial conducted in 14 hospitals in the United States evaluated the effect of a one-time dose of 500 mg intravenous (IV) azithromycin on post-cesarean infections. Women with a singleton pregnancy of at least 24 weeks’ gestation were eligible for inclusion if they required nonelective cesarean delivery during labor or at least 4 hours after membrane rupture. Patients were excluded if they had a known azithromycin allergy, subsequent vaginal delivery, azithromycin use within the week prior to randomization, extensive hepatic or renal dysfunction, a known history of prolonged QT interval, or substantial electrolyte abnormalities. Patients were eligible even if they were receiving other antibiotics for a positive group B Streptococcus screening.1

All patients (N=2013) were treated with standard antibiotic prophylaxis, most often cefazolin, according to individual institution protocols. The women were randomized to receive either an azithromycin 500 mg/250 mL IV infusion (n=1019) or an identical placebo IV infusion (n=994) within one hour of the procedure. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of endometritis, wound infection, or other infections occurring up to 6 weeks after the c-section. Secondary outcomes included neonatal death, sepsis, and other neonatal and maternal complications.1

Patients in the placebo group had a higher rate of smoking during pregnancy; the researchers found no other significant differences.1

Results. The primary composite outcome occurred less frequently in the azithromycin group than in the placebo group (6.1% vs 12.1%; relative risk [RR]=0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.68; number needed to treat [NNT]=17). When the researchers looked at the individual elements of the primary composite outcome, 2 had significant reductions vs placebo.

Endometritis (3.8% vs 6.1%; RR=0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92; NNT=44) and wound infections (2.4% vs 6.6%; RR=0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.56; NNT=24) occurred significantly less frequently, but there was no difference for other infections (0.3% vs 0.6%; RR=0.49; 95% CI, 0.12-1.94). Serious maternal adverse events were also lower with treatment than in the control group (1.5% vs 2.9%; RR=0.5; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94; NNT=71). There was no difference in composite secondary neonatal outcomes including death and serious complications (14.3% vs 13.6%; RR=1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31).1

Copyright © 2017. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

   Comments ()

Recommended for You

Articles from The Journal of Family Practice

Quizzes from MD-IQ

Research Summaries from ClinicalEdge